Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, Meters. G., Smurda, J., Davies, Meters. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Advancement and Human Decisions, 29(2), 119–126.
Cross-sectional investigation out-of intimacy, interests, and you may union: Investigations brand new assumptions of the triangular principle off love
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Yards. (2000). The area regarding connection when you look at the people mating. Summary of Standard Therapy, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, Good. (2002). Web sites paradox reviewed. Record away from Personal Products, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Sites paradox: A social technical that decreases public involvement and mental better-are? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, Roentgen.Meters., & Areas, J. Meters. (2001). Matter, time, and you will lifetime of marriage ceremonies and you may divorces. Most recent Society Account, 70-80, (Washington, DC: You.S. Census Agency, 2005).
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Elizabeth. (2004). Feeling most readily useful on the doing worse: Public evaluations within this personal relationships. Record of Character and Social Therapy, 87(1), 80–95.
http://www.datingmentor.org/engineer-chat-rooms
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A good., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Record away from Identity and you can Public Psychology, 97(1), 74–87.
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. An excellent., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automated inattention in order to attractive choices: Brand new evolved mindset away from relationship restoration. Advancement and you will People Conclusion, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. E. (1981). Sequential data out-of dispute and you will agreement for the disappointed and you can nondistressed marital partners. Record regarding Contacting and you will Scientific Psychology, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. An effective., Environmentally friendly, A. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Relationships development on the web: What’s the larger destination? Log of Societal Things, 58(1), 9–31.
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. Grams., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). Some great benefits of confident illusions: Idealization as well as the construction of pleasure into the intimate dating. Log off Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 79–98.
Neff, L. A beneficial., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-assessment purposes into the intimate relationships: A type of international enhancement and you will particular confirmation. When you look at the P. Noller & J. A good. Feeney (Eds.), Facts ents about study of couple interaction (pp. 32–58). New york, NY: Cambridge College Drive.
Intrasexual vigilance: New implicit knowledge regarding close competition
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the consumer-counselor bond from contact off attachment idea. Psychotherapy: Theory, Search, Routine, Degree, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). New personal keeping track of system: Increased susceptibility to personal signs as an adaptive a reaction to public exception. When you look at the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), This new public outcast: Ostracism, social difference, getting rejected, and bullying (pp. 213–226). Ny, NY: Therapy Press.
Pierce, T., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). Around the world and you can certain relational activities regarding experience of personal interactions. Journal out-of Personality and you will Personal Psychology, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A beneficial., Tran, S., ). Connection and you can information looking to when you look at the personal relationships. Identification and you can Personal Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and you will particular accessory representations in adulthood: Could there be a relationship?. Record Out-of Personal And private Relationships, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. Good. (2001)mitment and relationships repair elements. In the J. Harvey & An effective. Wenzel (Eds.), Romantic intimate relationship: Fix and you may enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, Good. D. (2000). Projection physically impact among partners since the a purpose of the resemblance within their mutual event. Identification And you can Social Therapy Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Effects of salience regarding extrinsic perks on taste and you may enjoying. Journal from Character and Societal Psychology, 38(3), 453–460.